Skip to content
FishGrade

Barbour

Crow Wing County
Near Garrison
DOW: 18003000
Northern PikeGood · 69Hybrid SunfishGood · 59Black CrappieGood · 57

A 56-acre lake near Garrison in Crow Wing County — best known for pike and panfish. Last surveyed 2022.

Fish Species (13)

Good · 69

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
31.0"
Avg Weight
6.79 lbs

Catch rate: 1.0 per gill net · typical 2.8–8.7 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20221.0031.0"6.79 lbs
Aug 4, 20100.5022.0"2.34 lbs
Aug 4, 20100.2522.0"2.43 lbs
Good · 59

Typical numbers

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
5.3"
Avg Weight
0.23 lbs

Catch rate: 0.75 per trap net

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.755.3"0.23 lbs
Aug 4, 20102.006.0"0.23 lbs
Aug 4, 201020.186.0"-
Good · 57

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
8.8"
Avg Weight
0.46 lbs

Catch rate: 1.0 per trap net · typical 0.5–3.3 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20221.008.8"0.46 lbs
Aug 4, 20100.258.0"0.30 lbs
Aug 4, 20104.048.0"-
Good · 50

Large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
12.8"
Avg Weight
1.61 lbs

Catch rate: 0.75 per trap net · typical 0.3–1.6 for a lake like this

Size of catchable largemouth bass100% keeper-size (12"+)
All keeper-sizeLargest sampled 18"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.5012.8"1.77 lbs
Aug 1, 20220.7512.8"1.61 lbs
Aug 4, 20100.506.7"0.38 lbs
Good · 50

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
5.3"
Avg Weight
0.21 lbs

Catch rate: 0.75 per trap net · typical 1.3–6.3 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.755.3"0.21 lbs
Aug 4, 20100.254.0"0.07 lbs
Aug 13, 19972.004.8"0.10 lbs
Average · 46

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
5.6"
Avg Weight
0.21 lbs

Catch rate: 8.5 per trap net · typical 5.7–40.5 for a lake like this

Size of catchable bluegill15% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 85%Largest sampled 9"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20228.505.6"0.21 lbs
Aug 4, 201025.755.0"0.06 lbs
Aug 4, 20101.005.0"0.23 lbs
Average · 40

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
5.5"
Avg Weight
0.10 lbs

Catch rate: 2.0 per gill net · typical 1.5–23 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20222.005.5"0.10 lbs
Aug 4, 20100.257.0"0.17 lbs
Aug 4, 20104.047.0"-
Average · 33

Typical numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 1997

Last surveyed 1997 — treat with caution

Avg Size
5.0"
Avg Weight
0.12 lbs

Catch rate: 0.67 per trap net · typical 0.5–2.8 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 13, 19970.675.0"0.12 lbs
Jul 29, 19741.50-0.20 lbs
Jul 29, 19742.00-0.20 lbs
Average · 25

Below-normal numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2010

Last surveyed 2010 — treat with caution

Avg Size
5.0"
Avg Weight
0.09 lbs

Catch rate: 0.25 per trap net · typical 0.7–3.1 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 4, 20100.255.0"0.09 lbs
Aug 4, 20102.025.0"-
Other species in this lake (4)

Rough fish, bullheads, and baitfish recorded in DNR surveys — present in the lake, but not typical angling targets.

Average · 40

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
10.0"
Avg Weight
0.67 lbs

Catch rate: 0.5 per trap net · typical 1–8.4 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.5010.0"0.67 lbs
Aug 4, 20100.509.5"0.50 lbs
Aug 13, 19970.339.0"-
Insufficient

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Aug 2010

Last surveyed 2010 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 2.0 · Electrofishing survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 4, 20102.02--
Insufficient

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Aug 2010

Last surveyed 2010 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 4.0 · Electrofishing survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 4, 20104.04--
Aug 13, 19971.33--
Insufficient

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Aug 2010

Last surveyed 2010 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 16.1 · Electrofishing survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 4, 201016.14--
Aug 13, 199710.33--

See the best northern pike lakes in Minnesota

Biologist Notes

August 10, 2023A temperature-dissolved oxygen profile was collected in the deepest basin on Barbour Lake on August 16, 2023, to evaluate the amount of cold, oxygenat…

A temperature-dissolved oxygen profile was collected in the deepest basin on Barbour Lake on August 16, 2023, to evaluate the amount of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee. Based on the profile, the top of the thermocline (i.e., the location in the water column with the sharpest transition from warm to cold water) occurred at approximately 13 feet. Dissolved oxygen decreased to below 3.0 mg/L at 24.7 feet, which was within the thermocline, at the time of sampling. The temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to below 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 8.3°C (46.9°F). TDO3 values cooler than 21.5°C indicate that oxythermal conditions are favorable for Cisco. Dissolved oxygen concentrations within the thermocline indicate that suitable oxythermal habitat for Cisco was available across a range of depths at the time of sampling during the summer of 2023. Data collected in 1974-2010 further indicate suitable oxythermal habitat across years, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2010. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and therefore experience higher levels of stress.

August 10, 2023A temperature-dissolved oxygen profile was collected in the deepest basin on Barbour Lake on August 16, 2023, to evaluate the amount of cold, oxygenat…

A temperature-dissolved oxygen profile was collected in the deepest basin on Barbour Lake on August 16, 2023, to evaluate the amount of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee. Based on the profile, the top of the thermocline (i.e., the location in the water column with the sharpest transition from warm to cold water) occurred at approximately 13 feet. Dissolved oxygen decreased to below 3.0 mg/L at 24.7 feet, which was within the thermocline, at the time of sampling. The temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to below 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 8.3°C (46.9°F). TDO3 values cooler than 21.5°C indicate that oxythermal conditions are favorable for Cisco. Dissolved oxygen concentrations within the thermocline indicate that suitable oxythermal habitat for Cisco was available across a range of depths at the time of sampling during the summer of 2023. Data collected in 1974-2010 further indicate suitable oxythermal habitat across years, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2010. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and therefore experience higher levels of stress.

August 10, 2023A temperature-dissolved oxygen profile was collected in the deepest basin on Barbour Lake on August 16, 2023, to evaluate the amount of cold, oxygenat…

A temperature-dissolved oxygen profile was collected in the deepest basin on Barbour Lake on August 16, 2023, to evaluate the amount of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee. Based on the profile, the top of the thermocline (i.e., the location in the water column with the sharpest transition from warm to cold water) occurred at approximately 13 feet. Dissolved oxygen decreased to below 3.0 mg/L at 24.7 feet, which was within the thermocline, at the time of sampling. The temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to below 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 8.3°C (46.9°F). TDO3 values cooler than 21.5°C indicate that oxythermal conditions are favorable for Cisco. Dissolved oxygen concentrations within the thermocline indicate that suitable oxythermal habitat for Cisco was available across a range of depths at the time of sampling during the summer of 2023. Data collected in 1974-2010 further indicate suitable oxythermal habitat across years, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2010. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and therefore experience higher levels of stress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What fish can you catch in Barbour?

Based on Minnesota DNR survey data, anglers target Northern Pike, Hybrid Sunfish, Black Crappie, Largemouth Bass, and Pumpkinseed in Barbour. See the full species list above for catch rates, size structure, and quality scores.

Is there public access at Barbour?

We don't have a confirmed public access point on record for Barbour. Check the DNR LakeFinder page for current access details before you go.

How deep is Barbour?

Barbour has a maximum depth of 54 feet, per Minnesota DNR data.

When were the main sport fish in Barbour last surveyed?

The most recent Minnesota DNR survey data for the main sport fish in Barbour is from 2022.

Does Barbour have any invasive species?

Yes — Barbour has confirmed zebra mussel. Clean, drain, and dry your equipment to avoid spreading invasives to other waters.

More lakes in Crow Wing County

View all

Lake Details

Surface Area
56.22 acres
Max Depth
54 ft
Shoreline
1.66 mi
Public Access
Not confirmed
View on DNR LakeFinderDNR depth map (PDF)

Invasive Species Alert

  • zebra mussel

Clean, drain, and dry your equipment to prevent spread.

Location

46.2613°N, 93.8780°W

Get Directions