Skip to content
FishGrade

Gilstad

Beltrami County
Near Blackduck
DOW: 04002400
Northern PikeGood · 62WalleyeGood · 58Largemouth BassGood · 50

A 257-acre lake near Blackduck in Beltrami County — best known for pike and walleye. Last surveyed 2023.

Fish Species (18)

Good · 62

Above-normal numbers · average-size fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jun 2022

Avg Size
19.3"
Avg Weight
1.67 lbs

Catch rate: 16.0 per gill net · typical 3.1–8.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 17, 20230.1818.5"1.74 lbs
Jun 28, 202216.0019.3"1.67 lbs
Jun 28, 20220.8219.3"1.76 lbs

Walleye

Stocked 2023
Good · 58

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jun 2022

Avg Size
19.0"
Avg Weight
2.02 lbs

Catch rate: 0.83 per gill net · typical 1.3–5.5 for a lake like this

Size of catchable walleye100% keeper-size (15"+)
All keeper-sizeLargest sampled 22"
Stocked with fingerlings every other year · 11,192 fish total
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 17, 202311.25--
Jun 28, 20220.8319.0"2.02 lbs
Jun 28, 20220.2719.0"2.77 lbs
Stocking Details
YearSizeNumberPounds
2023fingerlings2,876113.0
2021adults1,904148.0
2019fingerlings4,560114.0
2017yearlings21654.0
2017fingerlings1,54167.0
2017adults9550.0
Good · 50

Large fish

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Jul 2023

Catch rate: 13.0 · Electrofishing survey

Size of catchable largemouth bass100% keeper-size (12"+)
All keeper-sizeLargest sampled 17"

Size from the Jun 2022 survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 17, 202313.33--
Jul 17, 202312.98--
Jul 17, 20237.00--
Average · 43

Above-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jun 2022

Avg Size
6.1"
Avg Weight
0.09 lbs

Catch rate: 26.8 per gill net · typical 2.5–24.2 for a lake like this

Size of catchable yellow perch0% keeper-size (9"+)
5–8" · 100%Largest sampled 8"

Size from the Jul 2023 survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 17, 20230.334.8"-
Jul 17, 20230.874.8"-
Jul 17, 20234.094.8"0.06 lbs
Average · 42

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023

Avg Size
5.0"
Avg Weight
0.21 lbs

Catch rate: 0.27 per trap net · typical 1.7–8.2 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 17, 20230.275.0"0.21 lbs
Jun 28, 20220.505.3"0.25 lbs
Jun 28, 20220.555.3"0.16 lbs
Average · 42

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023

Avg Size
5.3"
Avg Weight
0.19 lbs

Catch rate: 6.5 per trap net · typical 5.6–42.3 for a lake like this

Size of catchable bluegill13% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 87%Largest sampled 8"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 17, 20230.675.3"-
Jul 17, 20233.465.3"-
Jul 17, 20236.555.3"0.19 lbs
Average · 40

Above-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jun 2022

Avg Size
5.5"
Avg Weight
0.05 lbs

Catch rate: 3.2 per gill net · typical 0.5–2.7 for a lake like this

Size of catchable black crappie0% keeper-size (10"+)
5–9" · 100%Largest sampled 7"

Size from the Jul 2023 survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 17, 20230.456.2"0.16 lbs
Jul 17, 20231.676.2"-
Jun 28, 20223.175.5"0.05 lbs
Average · 36

Below-normal numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jun 2022

Avg Size
8.0"
Avg Weight
0.42 lbs

Catch rate: 0.09 per trap net · typical 0.6–2.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jun 28, 20220.098.0"0.42 lbs
Jul 19, 20101.196.5"-
Jul 19, 20100.176.5"0.32 lbs
Average · 27

Below-normal numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jun 2004

Last surveyed 2004 — treat with caution

Avg Size
5.0"
Avg Weight
0.05 lbs

Catch rate: 0.17 per trap net · typical 0.2–0.9 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jun 21, 20040.175.0"0.05 lbs

Below-normal numbers

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jun 2016

Last surveyed 2016 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 0.08 per trap net

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jun 20, 20160.08--
Jul 19, 20100.176.0"0.23 lbs
Other species in this lake (8)

Rough fish, bullheads, and baitfish recorded in DNR surveys — present in the lake, but not typical angling targets.

Good · 51

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jun 2022

Avg Size
11.1"
Avg Weight
0.79 lbs

Catch rate: 0.55 per trap net · typical 0.3–1.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jun 28, 20220.5511.1"0.79 lbs
Jun 28, 20220.1711.1"1.46 lbs
Jun 20, 20160.2511.3"0.87 lbs
Good · 50

Large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023

Avg Size
5.0"
Avg Weight
0.16 lbs

Catch rate: 0.09 per trap net · typical 0.1–0.7 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 17, 20230.095.0"0.16 lbs
Jul 17, 20230.875.0"-
Jul 19, 20102.38--
Average · 45

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jun 2022

Avg Size
19.0"
Avg Weight
3.41 lbs

Catch rate: 0.17 per gill net · typical 0.5–3.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jun 28, 20220.1719.0"3.41 lbs
Jun 20, 20160.8317.4"2.71 lbs
Jul 19, 20100.0818.3"3.10 lbs
Average · 40

Typical numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jun 1998

Last surveyed 1998 — treat with caution

Avg Size
7.6"
Avg Weight
0.33 lbs

Catch rate: 0.67 per trap net · typical 0.3–2.8 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jun 28, 20220.507.3"0.35 lbs
Jun 29, 19980.677.6"0.33 lbs
Jun 29, 19981.837.6"0.33 lbs
Poor · 21

Below-normal numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023

Avg Size
9.3"
Avg Weight
0.52 lbs

Catch rate: 0.27 per trap net · typical 1.5–7.7 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 17, 20230.279.3"0.52 lbs
Jun 28, 20220.338.2"0.19 lbs
Jun 28, 20221.458.2"0.44 lbs
Insufficient

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Jul 2010

Last surveyed 2010 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 1.2 · Electrofishing survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 19, 20101.19--
Insufficient

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Jul 2010

Last surveyed 2010 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 2.4 · Electrofishing survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 19, 20102.38--
Insufficient

Seining survey · surveyed Jul 2010

Last surveyed 2010 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 1.0 · Seining survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 19, 20101.00--
Jul 19, 20102.38--

See the best northern pike lakes in Minnesota

Biologist Notes

August 5, 2025Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Gilstad Lake on August 5th, 2025, to evaluate the quantity…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Gilstad Lake on August 5th, 2025, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Cisco require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 55.8 feet), the water temperature decreased below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) at 12.7 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 13.9 feet at the time of sampling. The thickness of this layer of water in the water column was 1.2 feet, indicating that oxythermal habitat was present but marginal for Cisco. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 19.8 degrees C (67.6 degrees F). TDO3 values cooler than 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were marginal for Cisco at the time of the survey as the layer was confined to less than 3 feet of suitable habitat at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 2023 indicates suitable oxythermal habitat, with 3.7 feet of suitable oxythermal habitat. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

August 5, 2025Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Gilstad Lake on August 5th, 2025, to evaluate the quantity…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Gilstad Lake on August 5th, 2025, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Cisco require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 55.8 feet), the water temperature decreased below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) at 12.7 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 13.9 feet at the time of sampling. The thickness of this layer of water in the water column was 1.2 feet, indicating that oxythermal habitat was present but marginal for Cisco. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 19.8 degrees C (67.6 degrees F). TDO3 values cooler than 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were marginal for Cisco at the time of the survey as the layer was confined to less than 3 feet of suitable habitat at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 2023 indicates suitable oxythermal habitat, with 3.7 feet of suitable oxythermal habitat. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

August 5, 2025Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Gilstad Lake on August 5th, 2025, to evaluate the quantity…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Gilstad Lake on August 5th, 2025, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Cisco require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 55.8 feet), the water temperature decreased below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) at 12.7 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 13.9 feet at the time of sampling. The thickness of this layer of water in the water column was 1.2 feet, indicating that oxythermal habitat was present but marginal for Cisco. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 19.8 degrees C (67.6 degrees F). TDO3 values cooler than 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were marginal for Cisco at the time of the survey as the layer was confined to less than 3 feet of suitable habitat at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 2023 indicates suitable oxythermal habitat, with 3.7 feet of suitable oxythermal habitat. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What fish can you catch in Gilstad?

Based on Minnesota DNR survey data, anglers target Northern Pike, Walleye, Largemouth Bass, Yellow Perch, and Pumpkinseed in Gilstad. See the full species list above for catch rates, size structure, and quality scores.

Is there public access at Gilstad?

Minnesota DNR records list public access for Gilstad. Check the DNR LakeFinder page for the launch type and directions before you go.

How deep is Gilstad?

Gilstad has a maximum depth of 55 feet, per Minnesota DNR data.

When were the main sport fish in Gilstad last surveyed?

The most recent Minnesota DNR survey data for the main sport fish in Gilstad is from 2023.

Does Gilstad have any invasive species?

No invasive species are on record for Gilstad in Minnesota DNR data. Always clean, drain, and dry your equipment to help keep it that way.

More lakes in Beltrami County

View all

Lake Details

Surface Area
256.76 acres
Max Depth
55 ft
Shoreline
3.61 mi
Public Access
Yes
View on DNR LakeFinderDNR depth map (PDF)

Location

47.6693°N, 94.5310°W

Depth contours: Minnesota DNR, digitized from lake surveys of varying vintage. Water levels change — verify on the water.

Get Directions